pic from http://virtualmarketingofficer.com/ |
Very often we
have heard of why people hate HR. One of the recent ones which shocked me was an
article that appeared in HBR written by Ram Charan who is one of the leading
thinkers in the management space. His books which recently has been very focused
on people related issues ( The Execution
, Game Changers, Talent Masters etc)
have been a great value add for any people manager. However I would not be
surprised at why he or many others are frustrated with HR, although I felt that
a sweeping statement like “ Its time to say goodbye to the department of human
resources” may have been misread by many people.
As it is
often said in public policies that “ the people get the governments they desire”,
it is true about human resources and its leadership too. Most often the HR
departments that people get in many organisations is what the CEO’s , the
management and the employees really
desire to have. Once a very senior CHRO told a group of us that he wants to
bring in “GE practices at Wal-Mart budgets”. His intentions were absolutely
nobles, but guess what-it’s not possible. It’s not possible because GE and
Walmart are two different organisation having an entirely different
purpose. Wal-Mart’s mission statement is
"We save people money, so they can live
better". Now this means the HR department there will have to
function different from GE which works on four principle of Imagine, Build,
Solve and Lead. So in effect what you get from your HR department is what you
really want ,and in all honesty that is what every company should aim for. Getting
the right employees who finds a purpose to work for these companies is the value add that HR can bring , but it
should be noted that there cannot and may not be similar HR practices that will
be followed in these companies who serve different purposes.
Dave Ulrich has countered many people including Ram Charan when they say
it’s time to bid goodbye to HR using his 20-60-20 rule where he says one should
focus on “educating” the 60% of the HR
folks who needs to move up the scale. I fully agree with Dave on this as I believe
that it is this 60% of HR folks who needs to up skill and grow themselves to be
true champions of business. I have myself encountered situations where I have
at times doubted the value of HR , but then I guess rather than doubting the
value add of HR I should probably be doubting whether it’s just the case
of trying to fit a square peg in a round
hole.
There is always a huge proportion of so called HR folks who are doing administrative
services. Many business leaders may not
even be aware of the existence of these folks
who are actually the skeletal structure of the organisation but without them
the organisations cannot function. Then there is the middle managers who interact
on a day to day basis with business leaders and coordinate things between the administrative
part of HR and business folks. They are a highly visible role and this is where
I would put the 60% that Dave referred to who may create an “impression” of HR
and needs to up skill. These set of people along with the senior most HR
leaders in the organisation should have one main competency that is essential
for HR credibility and I would put that as “ entrepreneurial skills”. These
skills should make you fit in exactly into the purpose of an organisation and
if your entrepreneurial skills don’t fit into the company’s purpose of
existence then you would have to find one that fits you so that credibility is
not compromised.
It is important for business managers and HR professionals to have a
real understanding and dialogue of what HR “should” mean to them. This would
help the organisation have a right fit as I have seen often that there is a
disconnect between what you really want vs what you are willing to invest
especially when it comes to people. This
would help ensure that you can hire the right kind of HR leader and she/ he can can in turn design
an HR organisation which really is made of the kind of people who is inclined
to support the purpose and mission of your organisation.
No comments:
Post a Comment